- •Contents
- •1 Russian
- •1.1 The Russian language
- •1.1.1 Russian then and now
- •1.1.2 Levels of language
- •1.2 Describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.1 Conventions of notation
- •1.2.2 Abbreviations
- •1.2.3 Dictionaries and grammars
- •1.2.4 Statistics and corpora
- •1.2.5 Strategies of describing Russian grammar
- •1.2.6 Two fundamental concepts of (Russian) grammar
- •1.3 Writing Russian
- •1.3.1 The Russian Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.2 A brief history of the Cyrillic alphabet
- •1.3.3 Etymology of letters
- •1.3.4 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (basics)
- •1.3.5 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (refinements)
- •1.3.6 How the Cyrillic alphabet works (lexical idiosyncrasies)
- •1.3.7 Transliteration
- •2 Sounds
- •2.1 Sounds
- •2.2 Vowels
- •2.2.1 Stressed vowels
- •2.2.3 Vowel duration
- •2.2.4 Unstressed vowels
- •2.2.5 Unpaired consonants [ˇs ˇz c] and unstressed vocalism
- •2.2.6 Post-tonic soft vocalism
- •2.2.7 Unstressed vowels in sequence
- •2.2.8 Unstressed vowels in borrowings
- •2.3 Consonants
- •2.3.1 Classification of consonants
- •2.3.2 Palatalization of consonants
- •2.3.3 The distribution of palatalized consonants
- •2.3.4 Palatalization assimilation
- •2.3.5 The glide [j]
- •2.3.6 Affricates
- •2.3.7 Soft palatal fricatives
- •2.3.8 Geminate consonants
- •2.3.9 Voicing of consonants
- •2.4 Phonological variation
- •2.4.1 General
- •2.4.2 Phonological variation: idiomaticity
- •2.4.3 Phonological variation: systemic factors
- •2.4.4 Phonological variation: phonostylistics and Old Muscovite pronunciation
- •2.5 Morpholexical alternations
- •2.5.1 Preliminaries
- •2.5.2 Consonant grades
- •2.5.3 Types of softness
- •2.5.4 Vowel grades
- •2.5.5 Morphophonemic {o}
- •3 Inflectional morphology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Conjugation of verbs
- •3.2.1 Verbal categories
- •3.2.2 Conjugation classes
- •3.2.3 Stress patterns
- •3.2.4 Conjugation classes: I-Conjugation
- •3.2.5 Conjugation classes: suffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.6 Conjugation classes: quasisuffixed E-Conjugation
- •3.2.7 Stress in verbs: retrospective
- •3.2.8 Irregularities in conjugation
- •3.2.9 Secondary imperfectivization
- •3.3 Declension of pronouns
- •3.3.1 Personal pronouns
- •3.3.2 Third-person pronouns
- •3.3.3 Determiners (demonstrative, possessive, adjectival pronouns)
- •3.4 Quantifiers
- •3.5 Adjectives
- •3.5.1 Adjectives
- •3.5.2 Predicative (‘‘short”) adjectives
- •3.5.3 Mixed adjectives and surnames
- •3.5.4 Comparatives and superlatives
- •3.6 Declension of nouns
- •3.6.1 Categories and declension classes of nouns
- •3.6.2 Hard, soft, and unpaired declensions
- •3.6.3 Accentual patterns
- •3.6.8 Declension and gender of gradation
- •3.6.9 Accentual paradigms
- •3.7 Complications in declension
- •3.7.1 Indeclinable common nouns
- •3.7.2 Acronyms
- •3.7.3 Compounds
- •3.7.4 Appositives
- •3.7.5 Names
- •4 Arguments
- •4.1 Argument phrases
- •4.1.1 Basics
- •4.1.2 Reference of arguments
- •4.1.3 Morphological categories of nouns: gender
- •4.1.4 Gender: unpaired ‘‘masculine” nouns
- •4.1.5 Gender: common gender
- •4.1.6 Morphological categories of nouns: animacy
- •4.1.7 Morphological categories of nouns: number
- •4.1.8 Number: pluralia tantum, singularia tantum
- •4.1.9 Number: figurative uses of number
- •4.1.10 Morphological categories of nouns: case
- •4.2 Prepositions
- •4.2.1 Preliminaries
- •4.2.2 Ligature {o}
- •4.2.3 Case government
- •4.3 Quantifiers
- •4.3.1 Preliminaries
- •4.3.2 General numerals
- •4.3.3 Paucal numerals
- •4.3.5 Preposed quantified noun
- •4.3.6 Complex numerals
- •4.3.7 Fractions
- •4.3.8 Collectives
- •4.3.9 Approximates
- •4.3.10 Numerative (counting) forms of selected nouns
- •4.3.12 Quantifier (numeral) cline
- •4.4 Internal arguments and modifiers
- •4.4.1 General
- •4.4.2 Possessors
- •4.4.3 Possessive adjectives of unique nouns
- •4.4.4 Agreement of adjectives and participles
- •4.4.5 Relative clauses
- •4.4.6 Participles
- •4.4.7 Comparatives
- •4.4.8 Event nouns: introduction
- •4.4.9 Semantics of event nouns
- •4.4.10 Arguments of event nouns
- •4.5 Reference in text: nouns, pronouns, and ellipsis
- •4.5.1 Basics
- •4.5.2 Common nouns in text
- •4.5.3 Third-person pronouns
- •4.5.4 Ellipsis (‘‘zero” pronouns)
- •4.5.5 Second-person pronouns and address
- •4.5.6 Names
- •4.6 Demonstrative pronouns
- •4.7 Reflexive pronouns
- •4.7.1 Basics
- •4.7.2 Autonomous arguments
- •4.7.3 Non-immediate sites
- •4.7.4 Special predicate--argument relations: existential, quantifying, modal, experiential predicates
- •4.7.5 Unattached reflexives
- •4.7.6 Special predicate--argument relations: direct objects
- •4.7.7 Special predicate--argument relations: passives
- •4.7.8 Autonomous domains: event argument phrases
- •4.7.9 Autonomous domains: non-finite verbs
- •4.7.12 Retrospective on reflexives
- •4.8 Quantifying pronouns and adjectives
- •4.8.1 Preliminaries: interrogatives as indefinite pronouns
- •4.8.7 Summary
- •4.8.9 Universal adjectives
- •5 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1 Predicates and arguments
- •5.1.1 Predicates and arguments, in general
- •5.1.2 Predicate aspectuality and modality
- •5.1.3 Aspectuality and modality in context
- •5.1.4 Predicate information structure
- •5.1.5 Information structure in context
- •5.1.6 The concept of subject and the concept of object
- •5.1.7 Typology of predicates
- •5.2 Predicative adjectives and nouns
- •5.2.1 General
- •5.2.2 Modal co-predicates
- •5.2.3 Aspectual co-predicates
- •5.2.4 Aspectual and modal copular predicatives
- •5.2.5 Copular constructions: instrumental
- •5.2.6 Copular adjectives: predicative (short) form vs. nominative (long) form
- •5.2.9 Predicatives in non-finite clauses
- •5.2.10 Summary: case usage in predicatives
- •5.3 Quantifying predicates and genitive subjects
- •5.3.1 Basics
- •5.3.2 Clausal quantifiers and subject quantifying genitive
- •5.3.3 Subject quantifying genitive without quantifiers
- •5.3.4 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: basic paradigm
- •5.3.5 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates
- •5.3.6 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: reference
- •5.3.8 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: predicates and reference
- •5.3.9 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: context
- •5.3.10 Existential predication and the subject genitive of negation: summary
- •5.4 Quantified (genitive) objects
- •5.4.1 Basics
- •5.4.2 Governed genitive
- •5.4.3 Partitive and metric genitive
- •5.4.4 Object genitive of negation
- •5.4.5 Genitive objects: summary
- •5.5 Secondary genitives and secondary locatives
- •5.5.1 Basics
- •5.5.2 Secondary genitive
- •5.5.3 Secondary locative
- •5.6 Instrumental case
- •5.6.1 Basics
- •5.6.2 Modal instrumentals
- •5.6.3 Aspectual instrumentals
- •5.6.4 Agentive instrumentals
- •5.6.5 Summary
- •5.7 Case: context and variants
- •5.7.1 Jakobson’s case system: general
- •5.7.2 Jakobson’s case system: the analysis
- •5.7.3 Syncretism
- •5.7.4 Secondary genitive and secondary locative as cases?
- •5.8 Voice: reflexive verbs, passive participles
- •5.8.1 Basics
- •5.8.2 Functional equivalents of passive
- •5.8.3 Reflexive verbs
- •5.8.4 Present passive participles
- •5.8.5 Past passive participles
- •5.8.6 Passives and near-passives
- •5.9 Agreement
- •5.9.1 Basics
- •5.9.2 Agreement with implicit arguments, complications
- •5.9.3 Agreement with overt arguments: special contexts
- •5.9.4 Agreement with conjoined nouns
- •5.9.5 Agreement with comitative phrases
- •5.9.6 Agreement with quantifier phrases
- •5.10 Subordinate clauses and infinitives
- •5.10.1 Basics
- •5.10.2 Finite clauses
- •5.10.4 The free infinitive construction (without overt modal)
- •5.10.5 The free infinitive construction (with negative existential pronouns)
- •5.10.6 The dative-with-infinitive construction (overt modal)
- •5.10.7 Infinitives with modal hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.8 Infinitives with hosts of intentional modality (nominative subject)
- •5.10.9 Infinitives with aspectual hosts (nominative subject)
- •5.10.10 Infinitives with hosts of imposed modality (accusative or dative object)
- •5.10.11 Final constructions
- •5.10.12 Summary of infinitive constructions
- •6 Mood, tense, and aspect
- •6.1 States and change, times, alternatives
- •6.2 Mood
- •6.2.1 Modality in general
- •6.2.2 Mands and the imperative
- •6.2.3 Conditional constructions
- •6.2.4 Dependent irrealis mood: possibility, volitive, optative
- •6.2.5 Dependent irrealis mood: epistemology
- •6.2.6 Dependent irrealis mood: reference
- •6.2.7 Independent irrealis moods
- •6.2.8 Syntax and semantics of modal predicates
- •6.3 Tense
- •6.3.1 Predicates and times, in general
- •6.3.2 Tense in finite adjectival and adverbial clauses
- •6.3.3 Tense in argument clauses
- •6.3.4 Shifts of perspective in tense: historical present
- •6.3.5 Shifts of perspective in tense: resultative
- •6.3.6 Tense in participles
- •6.3.7 Aspectual-temporal-modal particles
- •6.4 Aspect and lexicon
- •6.4.1 Aspect made simple
- •6.4.2 Tests for aspect membership
- •6.4.3 Aspect and morphology: the core strategy
- •6.4.4 Aspect and morphology: other strategies and groups
- •6.4.5 Aspect pairs
- •6.4.6 Intrinsic lexical aspect
- •6.4.7 Verbs of motion
- •6.5 Aspect and context
- •6.5.1 Preliminaries
- •6.5.2 Past ‘‘aoristic” narrative: perfective
- •6.5.3 Retrospective (‘‘perfect”) contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.4 The essentialist context: imperfective
- •6.5.5 Progressive context: imperfective
- •6.5.6 Durative context: imperfective
- •6.5.7 Iterative context: imperfective
- •6.5.8 The future context: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.9 Exemplary potential context: perfective
- •6.5.10 Infinitive contexts: perfective and imperfective
- •6.5.11 Retrospective on aspect
- •6.6 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.1 Temporal adverbs
- •6.6.2 Measured intervals
- •6.6.3 Time units
- •6.6.4 Time units: variations on the basic patterns
- •6.6.14 Frequency
- •6.6.15 Some lexical adverbs
- •6.6.16 Conjunctions
- •6.6.17 Summary
- •7 The presentation of information
- •7.1 Basics
- •7.2 Intonation
- •7.2.1 Basics
- •7.2.2 Intonation contours
- •7.3 Word order
- •7.3.1 General
- •7.3.6 Word order without subjects
- •7.3.7 Summary of word-order patterns of predicates and arguments
- •7.3.8 Emphatic stress and word order
- •7.3.9 Word order within argument phrases
- •7.3.10 Word order in speech
- •7.4 Negation
- •7.4.1 Preliminaries
- •7.4.2 Distribution and scope of negation
- •7.4.3 Negation and other phenomena
- •7.5 Questions
- •7.5.1 Preliminaries
- •7.5.2 Content questions
- •7.5.3 Polarity questions and answers
- •7.6 Lexical information operators
- •7.6.1 Conjunctions
- •7.6.2 Contrastive conjunctions
- •Bibliography
- •Index
The presentation of information 461
[46]Z yt gjvy/, xnj,s yfi cfl ,sk rjulf-yb,elm gj cfljdjlxtcrbv ghfdbkfv e[j;ty.
I don’t recall that our garden was ever tended according to the rules of horticulture.
The special properties of negation derive from the fact that negation is an operator that proposes alternatives, thereby raising the question of which alternatives are to be considered; even as negation proposes one thing, it implies the imminent possibility of the opposite.
7.5 Questions
7.5.1 Preliminaries
Questions, along with imperatives, are the most overt form of interaction between the partners of the speech dyad.16 It is reasonable to distinguish between content questions and polarity questions. Just as some assertions can be taken as commands or requests, some assertions have the force of questions.
7.5.2 Content questions
Content questions are formed with one of the interrogative-indefinite pronouns, rnj´ ‘who’, xnj´ ‘what’, rjulƒ ‘when’, and so on.
[47]Jnrelf dtpkb? xnj dtpkb? relf dtpkb? rjve dtpkb?
From where were they carrying them? What were they carrying? To where? To whom?
While rjnj´hsq has become the most general relative pronoun, as an interrogative it is still restricted to selecting out one individual from a pair or limited set:
[48]Yf hjkm ,skj ldt rfylblfnrb -- Cjyz b lheufz ltdeirf. Rjnjhfz kexit? There were two candidates for the role -- Sonya and another girl. Which was better?
Usually the question word comes at the front of the clause ([49]), but it need not, if the question can be anticipated -- for example, as part of an exam or interview ([50]). As an echo or confirmation question, the question word can come last ([50]):
[49]Ult ds exbkbcm? Where did you study?
[50]Ds ult exbkbcm? Where was it you studied?
[51]Ds exbkbcm ult? Where did you say you studied?
16 Restan 1972, recently Comrie 1984; on negation and questions, see Brown 1999[b].
462 A Reference Grammar of Russian
It is possible, more easily in Russian than English, to use two interrogative pronouns in one sentence ([52--53]):17
[52]Rnj b rjulf bpj,htk rjvgm/nthye/ vsim? Who invented the computer mouse and when?
[53]“changed”: Erfpfybt, rnj b rjulf gjcktlybq hfp vtyzk lfyye/ fyrtne. “changed”: an indication of who made the last change in the form, and when.
Multiple questions can be understood to have a single answer (as in [52], where the perfective bpj,htk<pf> implies a single event) or a distributive set of answers (in [53], the imperfective vtyzk<if> implies iteration, hence one person for each occasion). Both question words can be positioned at the front of the clause ([52--53] above) or one can be left internal to the clause ([54--55]):
[54] Rnj bpj,htk b rjulf |
Who was it, and when, that invented the |
rjvgm/nthye/ vsim? |
computer mouse? |
[55]Rnj bpj,htk rjvgm/nthye/ Who was it that invented the computer
vsim b rjulf? |
mouse, and when? |
7.5.3 Polarity questions and answers
Yes--no, or polarity, questions in spoken Russian are formed by preserving the word order expected for an assertion while using question intonation, normally IC3, focused on one constituent. Focused on the verb, IC3 questions the verb or the whole situation ([56]):
[56]T3cnm gfgrb tot?
Are there any more folders?
[57]Jy nfv cdjtq vfibys yt bvt3 tn? Doesn’t he have his own car there?
If the focal syllable is another constituent, the question focuses on that constituent:
[58] F: |
Эnj ndjt3 ifvgfycrjt? |
Is that your champagne? |
V: |
Ytn, vjt d [jkjlbkmybrt. |
No, mine’s in the refrigerator. |
In written Russian, polarity questions can be constructed as in spoken Russian, by presuming the intonation contour that would be used in speech. Polarity
17 Multiple questions in Slavic have attracted attention for some time (Rudin 1988), in large part because they seem to violate the long-standing assumption in formal syntax that question words must be placed in a unique, privileged (structurally defined) position at the front of the clause. The tradition has since come to the view that the initial position of the question word is motivated not by notational necessity, but (in effect) by discourse (Strahov 2001).
The presentation of information 463
questions can also be marked with the particle kb in written (or bookish oral) Russian. The particle is placed after the constituent that is questioned, which occurs at the beginning of the clause. After a verb, kb questions whether the event or state as a whole occurs or exists:
[59]K/,bkf kb jyf vtyz? Rf;tncz, nj;t k/,bkf. Did she love me? It seemed she loved me too.
After another part of speech, kb questions whether that particular part of the information is correct -- the time frame in [60], the cause in [61], the quantifier in [62]:
[60]Crf;bnt, f lfdyj kb ds pfve;tv?
Tell me, is it a long time you have been married?
[61]Vs epyfkb, xnj tuj gjcflbkb. Pf xnj? Yt pf hfcghjcnhfytybt kb cnb[jd Uevbktdf?
We learned that he had been sent to prison. For what? Was it not for distributing the poems of Gumilev?
[62]Vyjuj kb xtkjdtre ye;yj?
Is it much that a person needs?
The particle kb makes indirect questions that can be used as arguments; for example, the question clause is the subject of a predicative in [63]:
[63]<elen kb hfccnhtkbdfnm pfkj;ybrjd bkb ytn -- jcnfdfkjcm ytbpdtcnysv. Whether they would shoot the hostages or not remained uncertain.
Answers to polarity questions vary in length and explicitness. The response can be minimal, consisting of just a polarity word, lf ‘yes’ or ytn ‘no’. Or the focal word that is questioned can be repeated,
[64]V: Nf,ktnrb c/lf, lf? Fktyf? Should the tablets go here, yes? Alena?
F: |
F? Nf,ktnrb lf. |
Hm? The tablets yes. |
[65] Y: |
Z yt vjue tt rhfcbnm. Djn wdtn |
I can’t paint it. The color I cannot |
|
z gjvtyznm yt vjue. |
change. |
B |
Эnj d ljdthtyyjcnb jujdjhtyj? |
Is that stipulated in the permit? |
Y: |
Lf, jujdjhtyj. |
Yes, stipulated. |
Or much of the syntax of the question can be repeated, with or without a polarity word:
[66] K: |
E dfc exfcnjr tcnm nfv, lf? |
You have a plot there, yes? |
F: |
Tcnm exfcnjr. Hfcntn xnj-nj d There is a plot. Something’s growing there. |
|
|
ytv. Vfnm pfybvftncz . . . |
Mother tends it. |
K: Gjvbljhs e;t tcnm? |
Are there tomatoes already? |
|
F: |
B gjvbljhs e;t tcnm. |
And there are already tomatoes. |
464 A Reference Grammar of Russian
Negation interacts with questions in a subtle fashion. In asking a positive question, the speaker makes no presumption about the answer. But in asking a question using a negated verb, the speaker indicates that the positive situation is expected, or hoped for, or imagined, despite the real possibility that the negative situation obtains. Thus yt elfkjcm kb rjve-yb,elm epyfnm ‘has no one succeeded in finding out’ suggests that the speaker suspects the situation might be true -- that someone has learned the answer. In response to such negated questions, speakers usually respond to the positive sense that the question would have without negation. Thus a positive answer means the situation under discussion is true, confirming the underlying positive possibility (in [67], yes, consistent with your suspicion, there will be isolation), and a negative answer means that the situation is not true (in [68], no, contrary to your suspicion, service will not go bad):
[67]-- Yt gjkexbncz kb nfr, xnj dfif ahfrwbz jcnfytncz d jlbyjxtcndt, f эnjn cj/p dc= hfdyj cjcnjbncz?
--Lf, эnj djpvj;yj.
--Will it not happen that your party will remain isolated, but the union will take place anyway?
--Yes, this is possible.
[68]-- Yt e[elibncz kb rfxtcndj ntktajyyjq cdzpb gjckt ecnfyjdrb ghjuhfvvs?
--Ytn, yt e[elibncz.
--Will not the quality of the telephone connection deteriorate after installation of the program?
--No, it will not.
Sometimes, however, negation seems genuine, as can be indicated by phrases such as yfd†hyjt ‘most likely’, rjy†xyj ‘of course’. The speaker wants to confirm that the negative situation holds. Then the addressee responds with lf and a negative verb to confirm the first speaker’s negative prediction -- ‘yes, as you say, it is true that not ’ ([69]):
[69]-- Ns rjytxyj d chjr ybrfr -- You of course will never finish by the
e;t yt rjyxbim? |
deadline? |
-- Lf, yfdthyj yt rjyxe. |
--Yes, no doubt I won’t finish. |
To dispute the speaker’s negative prediction, the second speaker responds with ytn and a verb of positive polarity, with the sense of ‘no, au contraire, it is true that ’ ([70--71]).18
18 Discussion: Zemskaia 1973:364 ([70]).