- •contents
- •preface
- •acknowledgments
- •about this book
- •Special features
- •Best practices
- •Design patterns in action
- •Software directory
- •Roadmap
- •Part 1: JUnit distilled
- •Part 2: Testing strategies
- •Part 3: Testing components
- •Code
- •References
- •Author online
- •about the authors
- •about the title
- •about the cover illustration
- •JUnit jumpstart
- •1.1 Proving it works
- •1.2 Starting from scratch
- •1.3 Understanding unit testing frameworks
- •1.4 Setting up JUnit
- •1.5 Testing with JUnit
- •1.6 Summary
- •2.1 Exploring core JUnit
- •2.2 Launching tests with test runners
- •2.2.1 Selecting a test runner
- •2.2.2 Defining your own test runner
- •2.3 Composing tests with TestSuite
- •2.3.1 Running the automatic suite
- •2.3.2 Rolling your own test suite
- •2.4 Collecting parameters with TestResult
- •2.5 Observing results with TestListener
- •2.6 Working with TestCase
- •2.6.1 Managing resources with a fixture
- •2.6.2 Creating unit test methods
- •2.7 Stepping through TestCalculator
- •2.7.1 Creating a TestSuite
- •2.7.2 Creating a TestResult
- •2.7.3 Executing the test methods
- •2.7.4 Reviewing the full JUnit life cycle
- •2.8 Summary
- •3.1 Introducing the controller component
- •3.1.1 Designing the interfaces
- •3.1.2 Implementing the base classes
- •3.2 Let’s test it!
- •3.2.1 Testing the DefaultController
- •3.2.2 Adding a handler
- •3.2.3 Processing a request
- •3.2.4 Improving testProcessRequest
- •3.3 Testing exception-handling
- •3.3.1 Simulating exceptional conditions
- •3.3.2 Testing for exceptions
- •3.4 Setting up a project for testing
- •3.5 Summary
- •4.1 The need for unit tests
- •4.1.1 Allowing greater test coverage
- •4.1.2 Enabling teamwork
- •4.1.3 Preventing regression and limiting debugging
- •4.1.4 Enabling refactoring
- •4.1.5 Improving implementation design
- •4.1.6 Serving as developer documentation
- •4.1.7 Having fun
- •4.2 Different kinds of tests
- •4.2.1 The four flavors of software tests
- •4.2.2 The three flavors of unit tests
- •4.3 Determining how good tests are
- •4.3.1 Measuring test coverage
- •4.3.2 Generating test coverage reports
- •4.3.3 Testing interactions
- •4.4 Test-Driven Development
- •4.4.1 Tweaking the cycle
- •4.5 Testing in the development cycle
- •4.6 Summary
- •5.1 A day in the life
- •5.2 Running tests from Ant
- •5.2.1 Ant, indispensable Ant
- •5.2.2 Ant targets, projects, properties, and tasks
- •5.2.3 The javac task
- •5.2.4 The JUnit task
- •5.2.5 Putting Ant to the task
- •5.2.6 Pretty printing with JUnitReport
- •5.2.7 Automatically finding the tests to run
- •5.3 Running tests from Maven
- •5.3.2 Configuring Maven for a project
- •5.3.3 Executing JUnit tests with Maven
- •5.3.4 Handling dependent jars with Maven
- •5.4 Running tests from Eclipse
- •5.4.1 Creating an Eclipse project
- •5.4.2 Running JUnit tests in Eclipse
- •5.5 Summary
- •6.1 Introducing stubs
- •6.2 Practicing on an HTTP connection sample
- •6.2.1 Choosing a stubbing solution
- •6.2.2 Using Jetty as an embedded server
- •6.3 Stubbing the web server’s resources
- •6.3.1 Setting up the first stub test
- •6.3.2 Testing for failure conditions
- •6.3.3 Reviewing the first stub test
- •6.4 Stubbing the connection
- •6.4.1 Producing a custom URL protocol handler
- •6.4.2 Creating a JDK HttpURLConnection stub
- •6.4.3 Running the test
- •6.5 Summary
- •7.1 Introducing mock objects
- •7.2 Mock tasting: a simple example
- •7.3 Using mock objects as a refactoring technique
- •7.3.1 Easy refactoring
- •7.3.2 Allowing more flexible code
- •7.4 Practicing on an HTTP connection sample
- •7.4.1 Defining the mock object
- •7.4.2 Testing a sample method
- •7.4.3 Try #1: easy method refactoring technique
- •7.4.4 Try #2: refactoring by using a class factory
- •7.5 Using mocks as Trojan horses
- •7.6 Deciding when to use mock objects
- •7.7 Summary
- •8.1 The problem with unit-testing components
- •8.2 Testing components using mock objects
- •8.2.1 Testing the servlet sample using EasyMock
- •8.2.2 Pros and cons of using mock objects to test components
- •8.3 What are integration unit tests?
- •8.4 Introducing Cactus
- •8.5 Testing components using Cactus
- •8.5.1 Running Cactus tests
- •8.5.2 Executing the tests using Cactus/Jetty integration
- •8.6 How Cactus works
- •8.6.2 Stepping through a test
- •8.7 Summary
- •9.1 Presenting the Administration application
- •9.2 Writing servlet tests with Cactus
- •9.2.1 Designing the first test
- •9.2.2 Using Maven to run Cactus tests
- •9.2.3 Finishing the Cactus servlet tests
- •9.3 Testing servlets with mock objects
- •9.3.1 Writing a test using DynaMocks and DynaBeans
- •9.3.2 Finishing the DynaMock tests
- •9.4 Writing filter tests with Cactus
- •9.4.1 Testing the filter with a SELECT query
- •9.4.2 Testing the filter for other query types
- •9.4.3 Running the Cactus filter tests with Maven
- •9.5 When to use Cactus, and when to use mock objects
- •9.6 Summary
- •10.1 Revisiting the Administration application
- •10.2 What is JSP unit testing?
- •10.3 Unit-testing a JSP in isolation with Cactus
- •10.3.1 Executing a JSP with SQL results data
- •10.3.2 Writing the Cactus test
- •10.3.3 Executing Cactus JSP tests with Maven
- •10.4 Unit-testing taglibs with Cactus
- •10.4.1 Defining a custom tag
- •10.4.2 Testing the custom tag
- •10.5 Unit-testing taglibs with mock objects
- •10.5.1 Introducing MockMaker and installing its Eclipse plugin
- •10.5.2 Using MockMaker to generate mocks from classes
- •10.6 When to use mock objects and when to use Cactus
- •10.7 Summary
- •Unit-testing database applications
- •11.1 Introduction to unit-testing databases
- •11.2 Testing business logic in isolation from the database
- •11.2.1 Implementing a database access layer interface
- •11.2.2 Setting up a mock database interface layer
- •11.2.3 Mocking the database interface layer
- •11.3 Testing persistence code in isolation from the database
- •11.3.1 Testing the execute method
- •11.3.2 Using expectations to verify state
- •11.4 Writing database integration unit tests
- •11.4.1 Filling the requirements for database integration tests
- •11.4.2 Presetting database data
- •11.5 Running the Cactus test using Ant
- •11.5.1 Reviewing the project structure
- •11.5.2 Introducing the Cactus/Ant integration module
- •11.5.3 Creating the Ant build file step by step
- •11.5.4 Executing the Cactus tests
- •11.6 Tuning for build performance
- •11.6.2 Grouping tests in functional test suites
- •11.7.1 Choosing an approach
- •11.7.2 Applying continuous integration
- •11.8 Summary
- •Unit-testing EJBs
- •12.1 Defining a sample EJB application
- •12.2 Using a façade strategy
- •12.3 Unit-testing JNDI code using mock objects
- •12.4 Unit-testing session beans
- •12.4.1 Using the factory method strategy
- •12.4.2 Using the factory class strategy
- •12.4.3 Using the mock JNDI implementation strategy
- •12.5 Using mock objects to test message-driven beans
- •12.6 Using mock objects to test entity beans
- •12.7 Choosing the right mock-objects strategy
- •12.8 Using integration unit tests
- •12.9 Using JUnit and remote calls
- •12.9.1 Requirements for using JUnit directly
- •12.9.2 Packaging the Petstore application in an ear file
- •12.9.3 Performing automatic deployment and execution of tests
- •12.9.4 Writing a remote JUnit test for PetstoreEJB
- •12.9.5 Fixing JNDI names
- •12.9.6 Running the tests
- •12.10 Using Cactus
- •12.10.1 Writing an EJB unit test with Cactus
- •12.10.2 Project directory structure
- •12.10.3 Packaging the Cactus tests
- •12.10.4 Executing the Cactus tests
- •12.11 Summary
- •A.1 Getting the source code
- •A.2 Source code overview
- •A.3 External libraries
- •A.4 Jar versions
- •A.5 Directory structure conventions
- •B.1 Installing Eclipse
- •B.2 Setting up Eclipse projects from the sources
- •B.3 Running JUnit tests from Eclipse
- •B.4 Running Ant scripts from Eclipse
- •B.5 Running Cactus tests from Eclipse
- •references
- •index
Unit-testing session beans |
285 |
|
|
techniques, thanks to the Factory pattern followed by the JNDI API, it’s possible to pass a mock InitialContext with a minimal amount of code.
We will now demonstrate three refactoring techniques you can use to unit-test JNDI code and, more specifically, to unit-test code that looks up EJBs (that is, that calls InitialContext.lookup):
■Factory method—Isolates the creation of domain objects in separate methods that can be overridden to return the mock instances
■Factory class—Isolates the creation of domain objects in factory classes, introduces setters for these factories, and provides mock factories for your tests
■Mock JNDI implementation—Sets up a mock JNDI implementation that returns mock objects whenever the lookup method is called
12.4Unit-testing session beans
Let’s follow the use case flow (see figure 12.1) and start by unit-testing the PetstoreEJB SLSB. You’ll try each of the approaches listed in the previous section. The PetstoreEJB code, which is the bean implementation of the Petstore EJB, is
shown in listing 12.1.
Listing 12.1 Initial PetstoreEJB.java
package junitbook.ejb.service;
import java.rmi.RemoteException; import java.util.Date;
import javax.ejb.CreateException; import javax.ejb.EJBException; import javax.ejb.SessionBean; import javax.ejb.SessionContext;
import junitbook.ejb.domain.OrderLocal; import junitbook.ejb.domain.OrderUtil; import junitbook.ejb.util.JMSUtil; import junitbook.ejb.util.JNDINames;
public class PetstoreEJB implements SessionBean
{
public int createOrder(Date orderDate, String orderItem) throws RemoteException
{
OrderLocal order = OrderUtil.createOrder(orderDate, orderItem);
try
{
b
c
286CHAPTER 12
Unit-testing EJBs
JMSUtil.sendToJMSQueue(JNDINames.QUEUE_ORDER, order.getOrderId(), false);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new EJBException(e);
}
return order.getOrderId().intValue();
}
d
public void setSessionContext(SessionContext sessionContext) throws EJBException, RemoteException {}
public void ejbRemove()
throws EJBException, RemoteException {} public void ejbActivate()
throws EJBException, RemoteException {} public void ejbPassivate()
throws EJBException, RemoteException {}
}
b c d
For simplicity, you have only one method to unit-test in PetStoreEJB: createOrder. As you can see from the code, this method calls two static methods—
OrderUtil.createOrder and JMSUtil.sendToJMSQueue—which, respectively, create an OrderEJB EB instance and send the order ID to a JMS queue (for later processing by the OrderProcessorMDB, as shown in figure 12.1).
Listing 12.2 shows the code for the OrderUtil helper class.
Listing 12.2 Initial OrderUtil.java
package junitbook.ejb.domain;
import java.util.Date;
import javax.ejb.CreateException; import javax.ejb.FinderException; import javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject;
import junitbook.ejb.util.JNDINames; import junitbook.ejb.util.JNDIUtil;
public class OrderUtil
{
private static OrderLocalHome orderLocalHome;
protected static OrderLocalHome getOrderHome() b
{
if (orderLocalHome == null)
{
Object obj =
Unit-testing session beans |
287 |
|
|
JNDIUtil.lookup(JNDINames.ORDER_LOCALHOME); orderLocalHome =
(OrderLocalHome) PortableRemoteObject.narrow( obj, OrderLocalHome.class);
}
return orderLocalHome;
} |
|
public static OrderLocal createOrder(Date orderDate, |
c |
String orderItem) |
|
{ |
|
try |
|
{ |
|
return getOrderHome().create(orderDate, orderItem);
}
catch (CreateException e)
{
throw new RuntimeException("Failed to create ["
+OrderLocal.class.getName() + "]. Reason ["
+e.getMessage() + "]");
}
} |
|
public static OrderLocal getOrder(Integer orderId) |
d |
{ |
|
try |
|
{ |
|
return getOrderHome().findByPrimaryKey(orderId);
}
catch (FinderException e)
{
throw new RuntimeException("Failed to find Order " + "bean for id [" + orderId + "]");
}
}
}
The OrderUtil class provides two public and static helper methods: createOrder (c) and getOrder (b). The createOrder method creates an instance of the Order EJB, whereas getOrder retrieves an Order EJB instance by its order ID. The getOrderHome (b) method is protected and only used internally by the other two methods introduced; it is used to retrieve the Order EJB home instance.
In this section, the challenge is to be able to unit-test the Petstore EJB’s createOrder method (listing 12.1). The main issue you’ll have to overcome is replacing the JNDI lookup calls to return mock objects instead of the real objects. The static methods in listing 12.2 will be the main hurdle.
Listing 12.3 shows the code for the JMSUtil helper class.
288CHAPTER 12
Unit-testing EJBs
Listing 12.3 Initial JMSUtil.java
package junitbook.ejb.util;
import java.io.Serializable; import javax.jms.JMSException; import javax.jms.ObjectMessage; import javax.jms.Queue;
import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory; import javax.jms.QueueSender;
import javax.jms.QueueSession; import javax.naming.InitialContext; import javax.naming.NamingException;
public class JMSUtil
{
public static void sendToJMSQueue(String queueName, Serializable obj, boolean transacted)
throws NamingException, JMSException
{
b
InitialContext ic = null;
QueueConnection cnn = null;
QueueSender sender = null;
QueueSession session = null;
try
{
ic = new InitialContext();
Queue queue = (Queue) ic.lookup(queueName);
QueueConnectionFactory factory = (QueueConnectionFactory) ic.lookup( JNDINames.QUEUE_CONNECTION_FACTORY);
cnn = factory.createQueueConnection(); session = cnn.createQueueSession(transacted,
QueueSession.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
ObjectMessage msg = session.createObjectMessage(obj);
sender = session.createSender(queue); sender.send(msg);
}
finally
{
if (sender != null)
{
sender.close();
}
if (session != null)
{
session.close();